Whose Name Shapes a Place? Franklin Park, Elma Lewis, and the Power of Place Names

Tami Gordon, Nature in the City Fellow

Group of people at Elma Lewis Playhouse at rally in Franklin Park, 1968 via Boston Public Library

Boston’s Franklin Park is not only a site for recreation—it is also a space where competing narratives of history, identity, and belonging unfold. As the largest park in the Emerald Necklace Park System, the park hosts an array of wooded trails, open meadows, recreational fields, and the Franklin Park Zoo, offering a range of experiences that connect residents to nature within an urban environment.  

My professional project focuses on how Afro-Caribbean immigrant communities experience outdoor spaces and build a sense of belonging and meaning within their neighborhood. Building on Nature in the City’s goal of increasing access to nature, I have come to see that physical proximity to green space is not enough; access must also be cultural, relational, and grounded in community representation. My own experience in Franklin Park helped bring this research into focus. 

Before moving to Boston, I spent every summer with my family in the Bronx, where our neighbors, storekeepers, churches, and rhythms were intrinsically Caribbean. I understand my Caribbean heritage as an essential part of my Black diasporic identity, yet Boston’s perceived lack of a distinct Afro-Caribbean cultural presence often made that part of me feel isolated and flattened—reduced to race alone.   

That changed when I unexpectedly encountered Boston’s Trinidad-Style Carnival parade along Franklin Park.  

I saw paradegoers exchanging beaded bracelets, singing and dancing to familiar riddims under the proudly displayed Caribbean flags that stretch down the avenue for miles—symbols that grounded my international heritage within a place I had once assumed lacked Black and Caribbean presence. Events like Carnival, along with informal gatherings, cookouts, and community programming position Franklin Park as more than just a green space—it is a site for cultural continuity and identity-making. My work on this project has also illuminated the importance of local stewardship and intentional cultural representation of the communities that green spaces are a part of.  

While researching Caribbean community leaders, I repeatedly encountered the name Elma Lewis. When I later saw her connection to Franklin Park and the important role that she played in reviving Franklin Park as a point of pride for the community, I was upset by the absence of a prominent, permanent physical marker honoring her legacy within the park itself as a Caribbean-American and a Bostonian.   

In the 1960’s, Miss Lewis led a massive cleanup campaign to restore Franklin Park, which had suffered from neglect, rats, garbage, and drug paraphernalia.  

After its restoration, Miss Lewis created the Elma Lewis Playhouse-in-the-Park, which brought free, nightly performances to Franklin Park. These programs fostered some of Boston’s largest and most meaningful cultural gatherings and featured some of Boston’s greatest performers, including Duke Ellington and Odetta. The Playhouse is a vital cultural institution in Boston, and Miss Lewis’ legacy of access to nature, cultural pride, and creative expression is carried forward by the Franklin Park Coalition.   

Franklin Park was once a heavily neglected area of Boston, and without Miss Lewis’ vision and relationship to the space, we would not have the Playhouse concert series and a welcoming park to gather outdoors with our loved ones. As the City of Boston changes over time, future leaders must recognize and honor the lasting traces of earlier times to be equitable.  


Tami Gordon (they/them/theirs) is the Nature in the City Fellow for Cohort 4 (2025-2026). Tami works with the Nature in the City program staff and provides support to both the Boston Tree Alliance and Broadmeadow Brook. A recent graduate from Boston University’s Earth and Environmental Sciences program, Tami has been a lover of the environment since they were a child growing up with the stories of their Jamaican and Trinidadian household. When they’re not at work, you can find them making music, birding, or writing. 

Image Source: Group of people at Elma Lewis Playhouse at rally in Franklin Park [Photograph]. (1968, September 25). Retrieved from https://ark.digitalcommonwealth.org/ark:/50959/rb68zd10q

Stewardship Beyond Parcel Lines 

By Isabella Acosta-Jimenez, Land Conservation Fellow 

Students from UMass Amherst Forest Resource Management course gather at Arcadia Wildlife Sanctuary for the Student Research Summit. Isabella Acosta-Jimenez stands at center. Mass Audubon ecologists Christian Marks and Tom Lautzenheiser on the far right.  

If you’ve ever looked at property lines on a map, it’s easy to forget that nature doesn’t recognize those boundaries. Deer bound over stone walls. Seeds travel on the wind. Brooks flow downhill. Invasive species spread wherever they can. The invisible lines between two points on the ground are there to show humans who “owns” what, but they mean little to the ecological systems that move freely across them.

I encounter this tension daily in my work protecting priority habitats alongside private landowners, municipalities, and conservation organizations. A stone wall may divide two parcels, one that is part of a wildlife sanctuary with an ecological management plan, and the other privately managed, but buckthorn, beech leaf disease, and deer pressure permeate both. (“Parcels” are individual units of land ownership, and neighboring properties that share a boundary are referred to as abutting.)

We use mechanisms such as conservation restrictions (CR), legal agreements that permanently limit development on privately-owned land, to protect properties neighboring Mass Audubon sanctuaries. These conserved parcels often function as buffers to our sanctuaries, despite often being managed separately or not at all.

When I began my work as the Land Conservation Fellow, I saw protection itself as the goal: secure the land, monitor the boundary, conserve what’s inside. Over time, I’ve come to see how incomplete that approach is. Rather than treating protected parcels as isolated units, we must manage habitats continuously across privately owned protected land and abutting Mass Audubon-owned properties.

My professional project aims to bridge that divide by coordinating stewardship plans across property lines, engaging landowners in shared management strategies, and collaborating with university students and experienced volunteers on field-based projects to assess habitat vulnerabilities across boundaries.

It also extends beyond the field. At a Student Research Summit this May, students from UMass Amherst and Westfield State presented their findings, turning site-specific observations into a broader conversation about landscape-scale stewardship. Collaborators, including students, conservation practitioners, educators, and landowners, came together and, through listening and engagement, we explored methods to evaluate climate resilience, identify and quantify vulnerabilities, and develop adaptive management plans that reflect how ecological systems function on the ground, beyond boundary lines drawn on paper.

Managing by habitat rather than boundary recognizes ecological continuity, and it plays out visibly on the ground. For example, an ash tree grows on a slope above a meandering brook that serves as a parcel boundary. On one side, the land is a sanctuary; on the other, it is privately managed—yet the system functions as one. One year, a regional drought strikes, and the soils dry across the entire slope. Deer move freely between properties, traversing the slope and compacting earth, accelerating erosion on both sides. Roots become exposed, and the tree weakens—along with all the ashes around it. The emerald ash borer arrives, thriving in this landscape-scale stress. Within years, the ash trees are gone—not just from a single parcel, but from the connected system.

During a conversation with a conservation restriction landowner distressed by the loss of ash, beech, and hemlock on her property, I realized how widespread these issues are. When I shared Mass Audubon’s approach—that these species are unlikely to return at scale, and stewardship now requires adaptation rather than restoration—she was stunned. Protection, she realized, was no longer a guarantee of ecosystem stability.

She’s not the only landowner grappling with this reality. In a recent Mass Audubon survey, CR deedholders list their top concerns as invasive species management, trail maintenance, and wildlife habitat stewardship. Many are navigating public access and ecological care without the technical capacity or resources to address the threats that move freely across property lines onto their land. They aren’t asking to relinquish their ownership. They’re asking for partnership.

Large conservation organizations, while often stretched thin, hold a broader regional perspective, along with technical expertise, volunteer networks, and access to funding that individual landowners don’t have on their own. My work sits at that intersection: connecting landowners to support, aligning stewardship across boundaries, and treating ecological care as a shared responsibility rather than an individual burden.

This isn’t defeatism. It’s a recalibration. Rather than insisting on restoration to a fixed past, it asks what can function under changing conditions—and where human intervention can meaningfully slow loss without promising permanence. The Rights of Nature framework challenges us to see the land as a living system with inherent value beyond property.

Stewardship, then, isn’t about control but responsibility to support ecological processes that predate and will outlast us. The work ahead isn’t about drawing harder lines; it’s about caring for what moves across them.


Isabella Acosta-Jimenez (she/her) is originally from New Jersey, where her passion for the outdoors grew from exploring trails and open space. She earned a B.S. in Environmental Studies with honors and a minor in Anthropology from Davidson College in 2024.  

At Davidson, Isabella led affinity trips for students of color through Davidson Outdoors and completed an honors capstone using geoarchaeological methods to reconstruct the environmental history of an ancient agricultural site in Cyprus. After graduating, she au pair-ed in Italy, interned at an environmental policy think tank, and served as an instructor at the Cathleen Stone Island Outward Bound School. These experiences have shaped her commitment to scientifically grounded, inclusive, and community-driven conservation.  

Outside of work, Isabella enjoys reading, crafting, and exploring new places near and far.

“What will you do when we win?” 

By Hannah McGrath, Advocacy Campaign Fellow

Hannah McGrath left, with Katharine Lange of the Conservation Law Foundation, tabling for the Nature for Massachusetts coalition.

“What will you do when we win?”

That was the question that kicked off the Nature for Massachusetts coalition 2026 planning session, and it stuck with me. Not because I had a profound answer, but because it revealed how policy work can feel both far away and suddenly near. The campaign’s outcome, to dedicate $100 million annually for improving access and protecting nature, could come in November. It seems far off on a calendar, but the amount of work ahead and the pace we need to move at makes it feel like it is rushing toward us.

As my fellowship with the Policy and Advocacy team is progressing, I am gaining a deeper understanding of what makes a policy win possible and why the work moves both slowly and quickly.

Some parts need to happen in a flash: drafting testimony on short timelines, preparing social media language, mobilizing volunteers to act, and responding to breaking policy developments.

Other parts unfold slowly to build a strong foundation for successful policy work: researching potential solar sites, defining our strategy, creating fact sheets on the climate literacy bill our youth programs focus on, and helping coordinate volunteer efforts ahead of the short signature collection period for the Nature for Massachusetts ballot campaign.

Somewhere in the middle of all the fast and slow work, I am developing a clearer sense of what’s needed for a win that benefits everyone. Since this fellowship is based in Mass Audubon’s Diversity and Inclusion department, I’m learning that good, long-lasting policy is shaped by who is at the table and how we work together toward a shared goal. That means asking who’s missing from the room, why, and how we can listen and create space for the voices that are missing, even as the work accelerates. I feel lucky to be working with people across our teams and coalitions who think about that too.

Looking back on that planning session, I still don’t know what I will do when we win. But I understand what it takes to get there, pairing urgency while building a strong base.

You can be part of this work by helping us collect signatures in May to get Nature for Massachusetts on the ballot.


Hannah McGrath (she/her) grew up in New Hampshire and got her start in environmental policy as a canvasser in Vermont. She earned her B.A from Hobart and William Smith Colleges as a double major in environmental studies and geoscience, and minored in public policy. She was also a student athlete on the field hockey team and conducted research microplastics in the atmosphere.

Before Mass Audubon, Hannah was an environmental organizer, where she led multiple environmental campaigns. During this time, she was a part of efforts to advocate for renewable energy, expand marine protected areas and ban plastic bags in California by collecting over 11,000 signatures.

Wading My Way Through Salt Marsh Science and Restoration  

By Tiare Sierra Rivera, Ecological Restoration Fellow 

Photo by Isabelle Lam at Plum Island Sound in September 2024. Tiare is pictured in the middle, in yellow, with Prof. Fagherrazzi, in green, taking a picture of the moment. 

Not too long ago, I stepped into a salt marsh for the first time.  It was a warm and sunny September day, and I was a senior at Boston University taking a class, “Estuaries and Nearshore Systems,” with Professor Sergio Fagherrazzi—a big name in the salt marsh world for his work on marsh morphodynamics during accelerated sea level rise. As part of the class, we headed out to Plum Island Sound, the largest estuarine ecosystem in New England, to collect elevation and sediment data. 

It was wonderful: the bright green grasses rolled toward the horizon, the deep blue of the ocean pushed in and out with this quiet-but-powerful rhythm, and then… the smell. A strong, putrid, decomposing peat-meets-salt smell. And yet, paired with the stunning scene and fascinating science at hand, I loved it. By the time I got home, my camera roll had 40 new photos—horseshoe crabs, mud patterns, pickleweed, everything. I had never seen a salt marsh before, since we don’t have them back home in Puerto Rico. Maybe that’s why it felt so magical. But I also couldn’t help thinking: How have I lived in Boston for three years and no one has ever mentioned these places to me? 

On the last day of the class, Professor Fagherrazzi awarded me the “Crab Award,” given to the student who had the most fun (and was the most clumsy) on our field work trips out at Plum Island. Fast forward to today, a little over two years later, and the biggest project of my fellowship with Mass Audubon’s Ecological Restoration team has been, fittingly, the Salt Marsh Framework.  

Mass Audubon’s Senior Coastal Ecologist Sara Grady has been dreaming about this project since 2024. When I joined the Ecological Restoration team in June 2025, she told me about her idea of mapping all salt marshes in the state and gathering multiple datasets to visualize information on the present and future of salt marshes in Massachusetts. She then hoped to use that data to roll out statewide management and restoration recommendations to local governments, organizations, and scientists interested in restoration. 305 hours of work later, from October 2025 to April 2026, the Salt Marsh Framework is now doing just that.  

Today, the Salt Marsh Framework is a GIS-based model that scores marshes across three dimensions: Condition (looking at vegetation health and surrounding land use); Trajectory (accounting for tidal position, elevation gain, marsh-edge exposure); and Migration (assessing potential opportunities for salt marsh landward movement as sea level rises). These scores connect directly to restoration and management actions, helping users understand both the urgency and the restoration potential. The framework includes extra “lenses” like marsh size, blue carbon value, and bird habitat importance so anyone—from academics and students to researchers and consultants to conservationists and other scientists—can tailor decisions to their ecological goals. The version 1 Map Viewer product is now available for anyone curious about the state of Massachusetts salt marshes.  

Working on this project opened a huge door for me: I was recently accepted into the University of Rhode Island Graduate School of Oceanography to pursue a Master of Science in Marine Geology. Starting in September, I’ll be researching salt marsh resilience and migration across Northeast National Parks, from Assateague Island in Virginia all the way up to Acadia in Maine. Whether it is analyzing data or getting muddy out in the salt marsh, I’m excited for another opportunity to get to know these ecosystems a little better—both for my own pleasure and for a future full of healthy salt marshes. 


Tiare Sierra Rivera (she/her) grew up in Puerto Rico. She graduated from Boston University with a B.A. in Earth and Environmental Science, concentrating in GIS and remote sensing, and minoring in marine science. While at BU, she was a student-athlete on the sailing team, earning MVP honors two years in a row.  

Tiare’s environmental journey includes two summer internships in climate resiliency and environmental permitting, as well as a transformative summer experience conducting scientific diving research in Mozambique. During the academic year, she taught an accredited sailing course to fellow college students and served as a teaching assistant for an introductory environmental science class. 

Climate Education as Resistance 

By Scarlett Gonzalez, Climate Education Fellow 

Youth Climate Leadership teens at Wellfleet Bay in September. Photo by Scarlett Gonzalez.

Last October, the West Youth Climate Leadership Program (YCLP) hosted their annual Youth Climate Summit. YCLP is a Mass Audubon program dedicated to providing youth with the resources and training to combat climate change on a local scale. The West team’s summit is a large regional conference aimed at providing valuable networks and training for youth to launch a local climate project. The overarching theme of the summit was “Resilience as Resistance,” and I was asked to lead a workshop about education as resistance.

As I prepared, it became clear to me that education has historically been used as a form of control in the United States. Laws prohibited enslaved people from learning to read and write, and even after emancipation, segregation and underfunded schools limited educational opportunities for students of color. Until the twentieth century, institutions also excluded white women from formal education, barring them from most colleges and discouraging academic study beyond what society deemed “useful” or “appropriate.” Federal boarding schools removed Indigenous children from their families and communities and punished them for speaking their Native languages or practicing their cultures. For much of U.S. history, those in power used education as a tool of oppression and assimilation.

Today, as books are removed from library shelves, education funding is drastically restricted, and entire curriculums are canned, I’m reminded that what is considered “acceptable” knowledge is constantly being redefined by those in power.

Climate education is no exception. Many classrooms across the state see climate change and climate justice as too controversial to teach. And when schools do teach it, they often narrow solutions to individual behavior change – plant a tree, ride a bike, recycle more. Those actions matter, but they also keep attention away from institutions, policies, and systems.

When we teach young people about climate change, we give them something incredibly important: time. Time to challenge what people have accepted as “feasible,” time to imagine new and creative solutions, and time to think and act institutionally.

All of this was apparent at the summit. High school students were already knowledgeable about environmental justice concepts and community engagement tools that I learned in college. They weren’t asking what can be done; they were asking how to strategically get their solution implemented.

And they were ambitious. They didn’t stop at the implementation of cafeteria composting programs; they were sharing tools and resources to convince school board members to prioritize switching from gas to electric stoves in the cafeteria.

Through my work as Mass Audubon’s Climate Education Fellow, I get to guide youth climate leaders through the state’s political system as they advocate for the Climate Literacy Education Bill. The work is slow and full of meetings, coalition‑wrangling, and endless emails—and continues to be deeply fulfilling to work alongside teachers, union leaders, and students throughout the process.

When we teach, when we learn, and when we insist on access to knowledge, we practice resistance. Despite the daily flood of alarming headlines, these are precedented times. And personally, I find comfort in the fact that we’ve faced these lessons before.


Scarlett Gonzalez (she/her) is from rural Indiana, where her interest in environmental justice began through learning how the animal agriculture industry and labor rights intersect with environmentalism. In 2023, she earned a Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy and Environmental Studies from New York University.  

In college, Scarlett successfully encouraged her university to fully divest from fossil fuels as a member of the Sunrise Movement NYU chapter. She then worked with Rep. Raúl Grijalva and the House Natural Resources Committee as a Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute Public Policy Fellow. 

In her free time, Scarlett enjoys kayaking, journaling, and visiting new coffee shops. 

Beyond Boundaries: How Storytelling Moves Communities Toward Urban Resilience  

By Tami Gordon, Nature in the City Fellow

Tami Gordon, Nature in the City Fellow, at Mass Audubon’s Boston Nature Center in Mattapan.

As the Nature in the City (NITC) Fellow with Mass Audubon, I recently attended the Hope Summit in Charleston, South Carolina, a gathering that brought coastal and inland communities together to explore how land, water, and people are interconnected. Mornings were filled with workshops led by city planners, non-profit founders, early-career and seasoned professionals. Our afternoons were spent walking the city, learning through observation and experience. (Who knew that falling down the stairs on your first day is a great way to get people to talk to you?)   

The Summit’s focus on community resilience, climate preparedness, and equity reflects the foundation of the NITC program: meaningful engagement, co-governance, and place-based solutions. The central theme of hope reminded me that climate work is most powerful when it is rooted in collective stories and communal, hands-on experiences.   

A workshop titled Re-Story-Ation emphasized “Experience > Explanation,” reminding us that people are moved less by data than by what they can feel, touch, and witness firsthand. Effective environmental storytelling invites emotional and embodied understanding, making space for community voices that hold both memory and expertise.  

This raised key questions: Where does local knowledge—like shared memories of unofficial community landmarks or a farmer’s multi-generational expertise—fit alongside technical expertise, like standardized historical and landmark processes and agricultural policy? And in the American South especially, how does cultural incompetency limit ecological understanding? 

Inside the Charleston Museum, a painting of a Confederate flag hung over our conference room. Romanticizing slavery like this implies that some lives (and some lands) hold less value, a hierarchy that still shapes environmental inequities today. When land is treated as expendable, the people closest to it (often Black and Indigenous communities) are treated as expendable too.   

At the Summit, I learned that across the South, many plantations have been converted into wildlife sanctuaries. We explored how this sort of interpretation of historical land use often prioritizes scenery over the lives of enslaved people who shaped those landscapes. This is why climate justice cannot be separated from racial justice; cultural competency in resilience planning requires acknowledging historical harm, and development—even towards something “good” like a wildlife sanctuary—that ignores community history, like slavery, risks repeating cycles of exclusion.  

My time in South Carolina affirmed that my professional project—a key part of the Early Career Fellowship experience—must center cultural inclusivity, belonging, and place activation. Storytelling and embodied practices like dance, humor, ritual, being with the land are all powerful tools that help us face climate grief and reconnect with one another.  

People are not the problem—disconnection is. And reconnection begins with stories that make change feel possible. My upcoming study will discern how to embed cultural development into place-making by studying the lived experiences community members have with open spaces. Through this work, I hope to further the ways we all show up for racial justice, for our neighborhoods, and for the urban landscapes we share, so our cities can become places where everyone knows they belong.  


Tami Gordon (they/them/theirs) is the Nature in the City Fellow for Cohort 4 (2025-2026). Tami works with the Nature in the City program staff and provides support to both the Boston Tree Alliance and Broadmeadow Brook. A recent graduate from Boston University’s Earth and Environmental Sciences program, Tami has been a lover of the environment since they were a child growing up with the stories of their Jamaican and Trinidadian household. When they’re not at work, you can find them making music, birding, or writing. 

Piecing Together Conservation 

By Isabella Acosta-Jimenez, Land Conservation Fellow

Isabella Acosta-Jimenez, Land Conservation Fellow.

I used to think land protection was simple. At its core, I thought it meant safeguarding forests and wetlands from development. “Protection in perpetuity” sounded abstract until I joined Mass Audubon as this year’s Land Conservation Fellow, and I realized all that goes into it. Due diligence, legal agreements, and partnerships only lay the foundation, but conservation doesn’t end there. It’s a puzzle.  

It starts with people like me piecing together the “border” of the bigger land conservation puzzle—playing land detective and searching for opportunities to connect open space, parcel by parcel, story by story. Logistics and an interdisciplinary blend of fundraising, education, conservation science, and more all work in harmony to ensure land remains conserved and stewarded for generations. 

One way I do this is through participating in the Nashua Land and Waters Regional Conservation Partnership (RCP)—a powerhouse group of women who meet monthly to talk strategy. This partnership reinforces the idea that conservation is a collaborative and deeply community-based endeavor: conservation cannot happen if people don’t care. We ask: What does the local community want to protect? How do we meet landowners where they are, balancing their expectations while ensuring their land is conserved? And once it’s protected, how does the community want to engage with it?  

Through Mass Audubon’s 30×30 Catalyst Fund, seeded by MathWorks, we help smaller land trusts launch projects that reflect these priorities. Mass Audubon brings funding, expertise, and a spirit of collaboration to the table as we support organizations that work with community leaders and landowners to identify and elevate significant conservation opportunities.  

Recently, I visited a potential Conservation Restriction (CR) site in Springfield, an urban five-acre parcel that, frankly, was a bit grim: litter everywhere, blankets of invasive plants, spotted lanternflies sucking life out of trees, and signs of abandoned unhoused encampments. For the visit, folks came together from all corners: land protection specialists, the director of Mass Audubon’s Nature in the City program, city officials, and educators from both Mass Audubon and the National Park Service.  

Beforehand, I created maps to help us situate ourselves and understand the site’s larger context. As we walked the property and the surrounding area, we began reading the land and imagining its next chapter. What if the site could connect a nearby school to the adjacent protected space, allowing students to walk from their classrooms into greenspace and a restored wetland, where they could learn with and from nature? It’s just five acres, but it’s another puzzle piece—one that helps stitch together fragmented open space in Springfield.  

Land conservation often comes down to legal documents, title reviews, and GIS layouts. But it’s also standing in the field, imagining what nature could be and the impact that a relationship with nature could have. This cannot happen without site visits like the one in Springfield, which unite community voices on the ground and carve a path for land protection, management and engagement, once the land is secured.  

Conservation means aligning priorities, securing funding, and weaving partnerships to work towards a completed puzzle: finalized land projects. Every deed I review and every site I visit in this role reminds me that conservation is a puzzle—and I’m proud to be part of the team putting the pieces together. 


Isabella Acosta-Jimenez (she/her) is originally from New Jersey, where her passion for the outdoors grew from exploring trails and open space. She earned a B.S. in Environmental Studies with honors and a minor in Anthropology from Davidson College in 2024.  

In college, Isabella led affinity trips for students of color as part of Davidson Outdoors and completed an honors capstone applying geoarchaeological methods to reconstruct the environmental history of an ancient agricultural site in Cyprus. After graduating, she worked as an au pair in Italy, as an intern at an environmental policy think tank, and as an instructor at the Cathleen Stone Island Outward Bound School. These experiences have shaped her commitment to scientifically grounded, inclusive, and community-driven conservation.  

Outside of work, Isabella enjoys reading and exploring new places, near and far.

How Fascination Has Shaped My Career (and Life) Choices 

By Tiare Sierra Rivera, Ecological Restoration Fellow  

From left: Tiare Sierra Rivera, Emily Jones, Tami Gordon and Scarlett González participate from a day of field work at a cranberry bog restoration site.

If I had to choose one word to describe the thread that runs through my career journey in environmental science, it would be “fascination.” To me, fascination is that feeling of being so wowed by something that you’re moved to take action on it. 

It is a force that has guided my childhood wonder into a professional purpose. My parents are both sailors, and growing up, learning about sailing was a fascinating experience. We would sail along the coast of Puerto Rico and beyond, all the way up to the US and British Virgin Islands. I wondered how the wind powered our boat, and what the birds, fish, and wildlife I saw were doing. Looking at the coast from the perspective of the ocean made me curious about how much impact the oceans had on the land. Every day was different, but I noticed patterns and made connections based on where and when we were sailing. I didn’t know it yet, but all of these were seeds—fascination moments—that led me to where I am today.  

My love of fascination became more apparent in college. As a freshman at Boston University, I was introduced to the mapping and data technology of geographic information systems, GIS, and remote sensing, the science of obtaining information from an area or object at a distance, from aircrafts or satellites. Soon, whenever I wondered “what? when? how? why?” I could pull out my computer and explore it using GIS.  These skills allowed me to answer questions that fascinated me, such as “how did mangrove forests in Puerto Rico spatially change after hurricanes?” and “how has urban space increased in tourism hotspots in Puerto Rico over the last 20 years?” 

Then came the summer before my junior year, when I was a coastal resiliency intern at Woods Hole Group, an environmental engineering company that provides services for coastal, ocean, wetland and terrestrial environments. On the very first day, I heard for the first time the term “marsh migration”: the natural process by which saltmarshes expand inland in response to changes in environmental conditions, such as rising sea levels. It was another fascination moment, one that shifted my focus and led me toward developing a professional project looking at salt marsh migration corridors across Cape Cod, using GIS.   

My fascinating experiences with GIS, remote sensing and coastal wetlands led me to find the Ecological Restoration Fellowship opportunity as I was applying for jobs after college. When I applied to the Mass Audubon Environmental Fellowship Program, I felt that same spark of excitement. I knew this opportunity would bring more moments of discovery and more chances to be amazed—and it has. Working with the Ecological Restoration team here at Mass Audubon, I’ve spent a lot of time learning about cranberry bog restoration, the process of returning retired cranberry farms, often built atop wetlands, to their natural state by removing agricultural modifications like ditches, dams, and sand, and allowing native ecosystems to recover.  

It fascinated me how, after a cranberry bog is turned barren using heavy machinery, no seeding or planting is needed in historic wetlands for native vegetation to regrow. It’s a reminder that the earth is magical, and that sometimes, the best thing we can do is step back and watch nature heal itself. 

Now, I wake up every morning driven by the same fascination that first took hold of me as a kid staring out at the coastline from a sailboat. That sense of wonder—of watching nature work in patterns, of asking “why?” and “how?”—fuels my work in ecological restoration today. It’s those moments of awe that keep me going and curious about what’s next. 


Tiare Sierra Rivera (she/her) grew up in Puerto Rico. She recently graduated from Boston University with a B.A. in Earth and Environmental Science, concentrating in GIS and remote sensing, and minoring in marine science. While at BU, she was a student-athlete on the sailing team, earning MVP honors two years in a row. 

Tiare’s environmental journey includes two summer internships in climate resiliency and environmental permitting, as well as a transformative summer experience conducting scientific diving research in Mozambique. During the academic year, she taught an accredited sailing course to fellow college students and served as a teaching assistant for an introductory environmental science class. 

Decisions that Create our Future: Policy Work at Mass Audubon  

By Hannah McGrath, Advocacy Campaign Fellow

Hannah McGrath (right) during her work as an organizer for an environmental campaign in winter of 2023. 

So far, my 20s has meant making a lot of decisions. I’ve seen how choices like what classes to take, which jobs to apply to, or even what to eat for breakfast can ripple outward in unexpected ways.

During a summer in college, I decided to go grocery shopping with some new friends and one of them mentioned that they were working as a canvasser for an environmental non-profit. They asked if I needed a job. I did, and accepting that offer set me on a path of environmental policy that has lasted to this day.  

For that first job, I was a part of a group that canvassed for a plastic pollution bill in Vermont. I biked up long, dirt driveways in Tevas and a sweat-stained shirt and asked strangers if they wanted to give money to a random girl whose passion for environmental policy bordered on overwhelming. I watched people weigh resources, values and urgency about whether or not to give in those moments. 

Since June, I’ve been working as Mass Audubon’s Advocacy Campaign Fellow and witnessing a different caliber of decision making than I did in those early canvassing days. The decisions here last much longer than a few seconds and are far more strategic and collaborative. 

Recently, much of my work has revolved around supporting Mass Audubon’s participation in the Nature for Massachusetts coalition. Together with over 80 other organizations from across the state, we are working to secure statewide funding for increasing access for nature and protecting water and land. I didn’t realize how much thought went into something like this until I saw the decision-making process unfold myself.

One moment that stands out was earlier this summer, when I and the other Environmental Fellows met with the Mass Audubon leadership team at a welcome lunch. At the end of the lunch, we began to talk about Nature for Massachusetts, and were asked about our thoughts on the pros and cons of the coalition proceeding with a tactic to take the measure to the 2026 ballot. The process for getting a question on the ballot takes a lot of hard work – the coalition needs to collect over 100,000 signatures from voters, which demands a real commitment of resources.  

For the first time, I saw my peers contributing to these decisions. Our thoughts and opinions mattered here.  We weighed in, considering the payoff versus the effort, and talked through what else was needed to support the decision-making process. 

Through this fellowship, I’m imagining the future I want to create, and the kind of decisions that can help build it. Whether it’s choosing what to apply for, what campaign to focus resources on, or how to show up in a room full of leaders, I’m learning that every choice carries weight, even if I can’t see the outcome in front of me. Getting to be a part of campaigns that protect nature and people has shown me that this work isn’t passive. It’s something we choose, again and again. 


Hannah McGrath (she/her) grew up in New Hampshire and got her start in environmental policy as a canvasser in Vermont. She earned her B.A from Hobart and William Smith Colleges as a double major in environmental studies and geoscience, and minored in public policy. She was also a student athlete on the field hockey team and conducted research microplastics in the atmosphere.   

Before Mass Audubon, Hannah was an environmental organizer, where she led multiple environmental campaigns. During this time, she was a part of efforts to advocate for renewable energy, expand marine protected areas and ban plastic bags in California by collecting over 11,000 signatures.   

From Policy to Periwinkles: How Curiosity is Shaping My Fellowship 

By Scarlett Gonzalez, Climate Education Fellow

The Fellows preparing to kayak with the Mystic River Watershed Association. Left to right: Tiare Sierra Rivera, Hannah McGrath, Tami Gordon, Scarlett Gonzales, Isabella Acosta-Jimenez.

During a fellows’ field trip with the Mystic River Watershed Association, I stared into a vial of river water as the color shifted from clear to purple to clear again, before sheepishly asking, “So…what does this actually tell us?” 

The educator kindly explained that we were measuring the amount of dissolved oxygen in the water, and our sample indicated that the river had plenty for the fish and plant life to thrive that day.  

I felt a little embarrassed that I didn’t understand the Winkler Titration Method as well as my peers; my past work in environmental policy has often left me one of the most knowledgeable people in a room, and it’s been challenging, in my role as Mass Audubon’s Climate Education Fellow, to find myself in a climate-oriented environment and not know all the answers.  

But asking the “obvious” question is not a weakness. My job, I’ve learned, is less about having all the answers and more about modeling curiosity for the youth leaders that I support. 

Much of my time as the Climate Education Fellow is spent supporting Mass Audubon’s Youth Climate Leaders Program (YCLP), a program that empowers youth activists to lead and drive climate action across the state. Since starting in June, I’ve worked to strengthen the program’s structure—meeting with youth leaders, coordinating with coalition partners, and identifying gaps in onboarding and mentorship. I am also currently supporting the YCLP’s annual retreat, where youth leaders gather to share ideas, ask questions, and connect with one another. At this retreat, I’ll be leading a workshop on climate policy and advocacy, where interested youth leaders can begin exploring climate questions of their own.  

Recently, alongside the Massachusetts Youth Climate Coalition, YCLP leaders spearheaded H.560/S.391: An Act Implementing Elementary and Secondary Interdisciplinary Climate Literacy Education. I’m excited to help prepare them for an upcoming hearing and lobby day at the State House, drawing on my policy background to ensure their voices land powerfully. (Download this fact sheet to read more about the bill.) 

Outside of my day-to-day tasks within the Education Department, I’m challenging myself to interact with nature in ways that are new for me. Before this fellowship, nature was something I appreciated from afar; I have never been the type to dig in the dirt, poke around tidepools, or pick up periwinkles—now, that’s changing. As I help guide the questions that youth climate leaders are asking, I’m finding new questions myself.  

And while I may not always know the answers, I’m learning that the lesson is in the asking. 


Scarlett Gonzalez (she/her) is from rural Indiana, where her interest in environmental justice began through learning how the animal agriculture industry and labor rights intersect with environmentalism. In 2023, she earned a Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy and Environmental Studies from New York University.  

In college, Scarlett successfully encouraged her university to fully divest from fossil fuels as a member of the Sunrise Movement NYU chapter. She then worked with Rep. Raúl Grijalva and the House Natural Resources Committee as a Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute Public Policy Fellow. 

In her free time, Scarlett enjoys kayaking, journaling, and visiting new coffee shops.