Tag Archives: Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge

Meeting with Congressman Moulton

It’s been a busy few weeks of meeting with our congressional delegation! In the latest of our series of meetings, Mass Audubon and our partners met last week with Congressman Seth Moulton at his district office in Salem.

We discussed issues like the proposed Hydro-Quebec project, and related reservoir flooding and river diversions. We also explained our concerns about the federal legislation that would alter the management of a portion of Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge. The bill, filed by Massachusetts Congressman William Keating on behalf of the town of Chatham, is a misguided attempt to clarify a disagreement over management of the Refuge’s western boundary, but if passed would create a dangerous precedent for future legislation by others to give away, strip or weaken federal control over protected lands. We have instead been encouraging a negotiated, collaborative solution to be arrived at in Chatham Town Hall.

For these reasons, we encouraged Congressman Moulton to oppose the federal boundary change if it comes to a vote.

A scene from Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge in Chatham

Help Public Lands Stay Protected

Legislation that could remove federal protection from Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge is on the move again, heading for a mark-up by the House Natural Resources Committee tomorrow. The legislation filed by Massachusetts Congressman Bill Keating, H.R.1157, was filed on behalf of the Town of Chatham, and is intended to settle a dispute over the management of nearly 4,000 acres of submerged lands and waters within Monomoy.

The Refuge is comprised of a series of dynamic barrier beaches and islands that are constantly reshaped by wind and waves. Federal and local officials have traditionally worked together to preserve this area, but last year the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) released a proposed management plan that implied they had authority to manage thousands of acres of water, and the fisheries within them, beyond the low tide mark into Nantucket Sound.

The Service cited a map from the Refuge’s establishment in 1944 that they said included this additional area as within the Refuge boundary. But state and local officials argued that the federally-managed portion was only intended to include any land area that might build up above the mean low tide mark (through sand accretion, for instance), not the land underneath or waters beyond it.

A scene from Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge in Chatham

H.R.1157 makes the statement that the USFWS never had authority over the submerged lands in question. If passed, the bill would allow state and town to officials to continue managing the area.

As we’ve shared before, we are concerned that this bill could set a dangerous precedent for stripping federal protections for public lands and waters across the country, at a time when we are already seeing an assault on our national monuments, like the recent reductions in size of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante in Utah. This kind of legislation could create a dangerous opportunity for unfriendly amendments or future legislation by others to weaken federal control over protected land.

Instead of passing H.R.1157, we encourage all stakeholders to continue working towards a collaborative solution for managing this area that both serves local needs and preserves it as part of the Refuge System.

Mass Audubon is signing onto a letter to our congressional delegation urging them to reject the bill, and you can help too. Contact your congressperson and urge them not to pass H.R.1157. Let them know we can’t afford to remove federal protections from our public lands, and that we need to preserve the boundaries, protection, and integrity of our national monuments.

Managing Monomoy

The US Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge is a peaceful retreat on Cape Cod where Chatham residents and visitors can escape to walk coastal trails, take in views of the ocean, and learn about important salt marsh and barrier beach ecosystems. The Refuge also provides important habitat for species like endangered roseate terns, threatened piping plovers, and horseshoe crabs. Our Advocacy Department was lucky enough to see this all firsthand during a recent field trip to the Refuge.

We were also there to get a glimpse of the serene stretch of coastline that has become an increasing source of tension among local and federal officials over the past few months.

The focus of the conflict has been the management of the western boundary of the Refuge. Monomoy is comprised of a series of dynamic barrier beaches and islands and is constantly reshaped by wind, waves, and tides. Federal and local officials have traditionally worked together to preserve this area, but shifting coastlines have blurred the borders and management expectations.

A view from the shores of Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge

What’s the Issue?

The problem arose when USFWS released a proposed management plan for the Refuge implying they had jurisdictional authority to manage thousands of acres of water, and the fisheries within them, beyond the low tide mark into Nantucket Sound. The Service cited a map from the Refuge’s establishment in 1944 that they say included this additional area as within the Refuge boundary. But state and local officials argued that the federally-managed portion was only intended to include any land area that might build up above the mean low tide mark (through sand accretion, for instance), not the land underneath or waters beyond it.

Fishing activity in the Refuge has historically been managed by state and town regulations, so a shift over to the federal government would be a significant change in their view.

Capitol Hill Takes Notice

In an effort to resolve the problem, Massachusetts Congressman William Keating has filed a bill on behalf of the town to clarify the western boundary issue. If passed, the legislation would allow state and town to officials to continue managing the area rather than USFWS.

This bill is less intrusive than a previous version that would have set the limits of the boundary itself. Mass Audubon has concerns that this type of legislation could create a dangerous opportunity for unfriendly amendments or future legislation by others to strip or weaken federal control over protected land.

Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge

Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge

What’s Next?

While we wait to see if the bill will move through Congress, town and federal officials are also drafting a Memorandum of Understanding to iron out the details of the Refuge’s management.

Mass Audubon has encouraged this route from the beginning, both for the sake of town-federal relations, and to avoid the potential precedent it could set for land protection across the US to rely on legislative action for these types of disagreements. A similar agreement was reached over the eastern border of the Refuge earlier this year, and should serve as an example for this negotiation.

Ideally, we hope this issue is resolved in Chatham Town Hall and not in an environmentally hostile Congress or in a contentious courtroom.

In the latest action taken around this conflict, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s office has filed a Notice of Intent to sue the US Fish and Wildlife Service. We will continue to carefully monitor the situation and encourage all parties to resolve the matter by negotiation rather than the courtroom.

Advocacy Department staff on our visit to Monomoy. From left: Karen Heymann, Christina Wiseman, Heidi Ricci, Stefanie Covino, Jack Clarke, and Dan Brown

Advocacy Department staff on our visit to Cape Cod that included a trip to Monomoy. From left: Karen Heymann, Christina Wiseman, Heidi Ricci, Stefanie Covino, Jack Clarke, and Dan Brown

Want to learn more?

In addition to our comments to the US Fish and Wildlife Service on the management of Monomoy’s western boundary, Mass Audubon has written Op Eds in The Cape Cod Times and The Cape Codder and commented in The Boston Globe on this topic.

This New York Times article looks into the larger Congressional struggle to reconcile federal and local management of wildlife refuges, and includes Monomoy among its examples.

This Boston Globe editorial further highlights the issue’s importance.